Institut für Rundfunkökonomie
an der Universität zu Köln
Suche


English       Impressum       Kontakt       Bibliothek       Spenden      
Home
Aktuelles
Lehre
WS 11/12
SS 2011
Archiv
Forschung
Tagungen
2010 Düsseldorf
2010 Cologne
2010 Kyiv
2010 Bonn
2009
2008
2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998
Publikationen
Arbeitspapiere
Schriftenreihen
Links
Druckversion Druckversion
zur Homepage der
Universität zu Köln

zur Homepage der
WiSo-Fakultät

Arbeitspapier zur Übersicht
Heft 266

Bernd Holznagel, Christoph Nüßing:
Basic Principles for the Funding of Public Service Broadcasting;
Cologne, in June 2010, ISBN 978-3-938933-72-5;
21 p., Price 8,00 €;
 0,3 MB


This working paper is based on a presentation given by Prof. Holznagel during an international conference of the Institute for Broadcasting Economics concerning "The Future of the Broadcasting Licence Fee in Times of Media Convergence", Bonn, May 6, 2010. Prof. Dr. Bernd Holznagel, LL.M. is Director of the Institute for Information, Telecommunication and Media Law (ITM) at the Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster; Christoph Nüßing is a research assistant at the ITM.

As requirements resulting from the freedom of broadcasting the authors claim an obligation for sufficient funding, the independence from government, the independence from influence of the advertising economy and an independent procedure of funding-fixation. In addition they consider the requirements of the EU Legislation on State Aid. In a final chapter they discuss the problem of compulsory radio and TV license fees in the current times of convergence. As reform options a "minimal reform" with only minor modifications in known problem areas, a fee for households and places of business, and a capitation fee are discussed. "The question as to which of these funding models is best suited to fulfil the service remit of public broadcasting in the media landscape of today, can only be answered in practice. Furthermore, it must be empirically determined for each state individually. However, all three reform options have the advantage of a funding model that does not depend on the state or on commerce. In principle, they are capable of balancing the constitutional freedom of broadcasting and the EU rules on competition properly."
Table of Contents:

1.    Introduction

2.    Requirements Resulting from the Freedom of Broadcasting
       2.1.    Obligation for Sufficient Funding
       2.2.    Independence from Government
       2.3.    Independence from Influence of the Advertising Economy
       2.4.    Providing for an Independent Procedure of Funding-Fixation
       2.5.    Current Developments

3.    The Requirements of the EU Legislation on State Aid

4.    The Problem of Compulsory Radio and TV License Fees
       in the Current Times of Convergence

Literature
Aktuelles
27.04.2012
Hinweis auf Jahrestagung des Instituts für Rundfunkrecht
13.04.2012
AP 289 erschienen: Der Programmauftrag des öffentlich-rechtlichen Rundfunks in der dualen Rundfunkordnung – verfassungsrechtliche Bezüge
28.03.2012
AP 288 erschienen: Erfolgsfaktoren privatwirtschaftlicher und öffentlich-rechtlicher mobiler Content-Apps im Vergleich
26.02.2012
Trauer um Hans J. Kleinsteuber
22.02.2012
Hinweis auf Stellenausschreibung beim Landesrechnungshof Mecklenburg-Vorpommern

Neue Arbeitspapiere
Heft 289
Helge Rossen-Stadtfeld:
Der Programmauftrag des öffentlich-rechtlichen Rundfunks in der dualen Rundfunkordnung – verfassungsrechtliche Bezüge
Heft 288
Philipp Weidenhiller:
Erfolgsfaktoren privatwirtschaftlicher und öffentlich-rechtlicher mobiler Content-Apps im Vergleich
Heft 286
Olexiy Khabyuk:
Introducing State-Distant Public Broadcasting in Ukraine